First day of my LAP III

2- 2.35pm – civil case (friendly loan)

The plaintiff, Mr. Jit Singh 80+++

Baru sahaja perbicaraan hendak bermula, defendan meminta supaya kes tersebut ditundfa sehingga dia dapat melantik peguam untuk mewakilinya. Peguamcara bagi pihak plaintiff membantah permohonan defendan tersebut kerana pihak defendan sengaja berbuat demikian untuk melengah-lengahkan masa.

Peguam plaintiff memohon agar kes tersebut disegerakan memandangkan saksi tunggal yang juga plaintiff sendiri sudah tua, pandangannya makin kabur dan kesihatannya tidak lagi begitu baik untuk sering turun naik mahkamah.

Dengan itu, defendan terpaksalah mewakili dirinya sendiri….kasyiann dehh

Nota separa kaki: 1st tym dengar kes mcm ni in my 1st day here lak tuh..menarik2

Something that I quote from this very case

disputed money = RM 71, 500 borrowed by the defendant from the plaintiff. But the defendant contended that he only borrowed RM 6,000 with 10% interest per month.

“so, I do not have money to pay…how?”
---defend urself lah…don’t ask how to pay huhuh ;p

“ficticious letter never posted”
---“then, how did you get it?” to the plaintiff’s lawyer
---said that those letters were sent by his lawyer but he did not know when he actually appointed the lawyer…ha…ha…ha…NONSENCE!

Defendant also stated that they were good friends but claimed that the plaintiff will confine him if he did not agree to sign those agreement…haiya! Chi sin lor…

First day of my LAP II

Here in my court, there are these important persons:-

1. Puan Rasidah
2. two lovely interpreters, ms. Kan and ms. Saury
3. Macik Maimunah, handling the Pengurusan kamar 1
4. kak Nurul, akak interpreter baru yang sama2 baru 1st day macam gue
5. en. Yusuf as bailiff
6. then only mE came into this picture ngee ^_^v

the cases that I heard today are as follow:-

1- 11.15am- bribery case

DPP: Tuan Shahrul from BPR
Counsels: Mr. Tun Ammar & Mr. Shan for the 2 OKTs

Summary: Abd Razak and Mohd Nasir; two policemen who was caught by the BPR officers upon receiving bribe from one Bangladeshi man = RM 250 only maaa! Huhu

While observing this case, along the way, specifically when Mr. Tun Ammar was asking the OKT, I learn to know that all the witness or whoever speaks in the court must speak slo0000oooooowly so that everyone could write them as their nota keterangan for further reference….ohhh I seee

Tp bg lawyer2 yang kaya dan malas nak salin tuh, bolehla mintak kat jurubahasa Cuma lambatlah sikit tunggu kerani taipkan nota keterangan tuh ye ;p

First day of my LAP I

Starring: me & 5 ors

Hari ini aku datang lambat…8.03 sampai mahkamah…pergghh teruk betul perangai…eh2 tp bukan sebab teman ni bangun lambat ke apa…5.30 pg dah bangun kot TAPI ni semua pasal mesin basuh itu laaa…7.15pg baru nak siap…pastu dah reverse kereta neh orang kantin pulak kol suruh bawa air mimneral la pulak…tensen2…dahla pintu rumah semua dah kunci hu3…sadissss atas Jalan pulak kereta punyalah banyak dan lembab belaka…tensen LAGI huuuuu

Sampai je mahkamah, kawan2 yang lain semua sudah berkumpul dalam pejabat pentadbiran…sembang2 sambil tunggu Puan Azua, ketua Pendaftar kat Ipoh neh…dia yang bawak kami jumpa dengan Puan Hakim Kanan merangkap Pengarah Mahkamah2 kat Ipoh neh…ho2

Kami dibahagikan masing2 setiap satu kepada mana2 hakim & magistrate. Memandangkan kami hanya berenam, maka jadinya hanya 6 orang master sahajalah yang terlibat.

Senarai hakim2 & magistrate2:-

Hakim
1. Puan Rasidah  me ^_^v
2. Puan Tan
3. Puan Indra
4. Puan Yati  fatin

Magistrate
1. Tuan Nasrudin  akmal
2. Puan Roslinda
3. Puan Fauziah  mira
4. Tuan Shah Wira  zari
5. Tuan Ruhizat  nurul


Maka, dapatlah kami dengan tuan2 dan puan2 masing2. Gue memanglah sangat ‘bernasib baik’ kerana mendapat Puan Rasidah sebagai master gue hu hu hu nasiblah badannn …..